You are currently browsing comments. If you would like to return to the full story, you can read the full entry here: “Retrofitting Existing Homes for Energy Efficiency”.
This is an excellent article highlighting some of the issues around older homes. I look forward to reading more details about how to increase energy efficiency as I’ve been doing lots of my own research within my own real estate practice. Things we’ve looked at so far for my own home/office are rain barrels, CFLs, additional insulation, and renewable floor materials. I’d like to see more about compact wind energy, retro-fitting grey water recycling systems, solar, and anything else you can come up with to share.
Team Reba of RE/MAX Metro Realty
Wow! What a shocking statistic that 70% of greenhouse gasses are from houses built before 1983.
I felt proud of myself in having a “green” corporate rental (low voc paints, CFLs, energy from wind) until one of my tenants, who works for Xcel energy monitoring the wind for windmills, shed some light on my “do gooding”.
First, he said that when the wind kicks up they must power down the coal to a very inefficient level.
Second, he said if Xcel used the money it intended to spent building additional power plants on instead making homes more energy efficient, there would be no need to build the power plants.
His point was that becoming more energy efficient is the best and first way to be more “green”.
It’s great to see that the green movement has shifted from “put on a sweater, turn down the heat” to “install triple pane windows, use less heat”. It’s about time we put the technology we use to create comfort to also reducing our energy consumption.
Reduce, reuse, recycle is suppose to be a hierarchy. Reduce being the first.
Although we really want to have solar installed, especially with the great rebates in Denver, we have decided that making our home more energy efficient should be our first step.
[...] Homes built before 1983 are to blame for 70 percent of the greenhouse gas emissions related to single-family energy consumption in California. [...]
I am so happy to see that LEDs are now becoming available mainstream. I am so tired of hearing about CFLs without the attendant but critical warning about MERCURY. What a ridiculous Madison Avenue tradeoff, incandescent for mercury! True, CFLs might be cooler and cheaper, but how many people realize they must be disposed of in a very deliberate way? Precious few. To not do so creates HAZMAT problems.
That LEDs are now available surely will reduce their cost. At last.
Please, let’s jump on the LED bandwagon if we have to use lights at all. Daylighting might be the best way, but not everyone can retrofit or choose to build this way. At least LEDs are a great, long lasting SAFE solution!
This is an excellent article. I need to know how my clients should prioritize green projects. Is ceiling insulation #1?
Hope is important because it can make the present moment less difficult to bear.
[...] Underrate What’s Above Finding the Energy Leaks Perks of Radiant Heating EXTERNAL LINKS: Retrofitting Existing Homes for Energy Efficiency Share this:TwitterFacebookLike this:Like Loading… This entry was posted in Investment, [...]
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>
Use the form below to search the site:
Still not finding what you're looking for? Drop a comment on a post or contact us so we can take care of it!
All entries, chronologically...
A few highly recommended friends...